Text

AI Text Detector (Lite)

Heuristic scan for AI-like patterns. Educational estimate only — not proof of authorship.

Ready.

Editorial triage—not a verdict on authorship

Content leads sometimes receive drafts that feel templated: uniform paragraph length, vague transitions, and zero anecdote. A lite detector offers a conversation starter—"this needs a human pass"—rather than an automated rejection.

Reasonable use cases

Flag guest blogs for closer editing, prioritize human review in a high-volume queue, or teach writers what overly uniform prose looks like. Pair with disclosure policies instead of secret scoring.

Known blind spots

Heavily edited AI text, non-native English, and domain experts writing formally can skew results. Conversely, naive human drafts may look "AI" to simple rules. Always read the prose yourself.

FAQ

How accurate is a lite AI detector?
Not very. Short samples, edited AI output, and human technical writing all produce false positives and negatives. Never treat the score as proof.
What patterns does it look for?
Heuristics may weigh sentence-length variance, common AI transition phrases, and repetitive structure. Models evolve faster than rulesets.
Should schools use this for policy enforcement?
No. Academic integrity decisions need transparent, validated tools and human appeal paths. This demo is for curiosity and first-pass editorial filtering.